BCGD vs. GVAL
BCGD (Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
BCGD vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGD achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 15.95% return.
BCGD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 26.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
BCGD vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 1.00% | 1.64% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 15.95% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGD and GVAL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGD vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
BCGD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GVAL
BCGD vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCGD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCGD vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGD drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGD and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -46.82% | +33.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -3.51% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -13.82% | +10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.02% | — |
Volatility
BCGD vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 15.62% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 18.60% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 19.01% | -0.62% |
BCGD vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGD vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
BCGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.46% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGD and GVAL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCGD.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for BCGD.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCGD and 0.64% for GVAL.
Find the right allocation for BCGD and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer