BCGD vs. DRIV
BCGD (Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BCGD is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
BCGD vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCGD achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 29.53% return.
BCGD
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 29.53%
- 6M
- 27.42%
- 1Y
- 72.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
BCGD vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 1.16% | 1.64% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 29.53% | -1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGD and DRIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGD vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
BCGD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRIV
BCGD vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCGD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCGD vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGD drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGD and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -41.93% | +28.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -9.90% | +6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -15.07% | +12.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
BCGD vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGD | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 27.63% | -9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 27.57% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 27.63% | -9.17% |
BCGD vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGD vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
BCGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGD Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGD and DRIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCGD.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for BCGD.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCGD and 0.68% for DRIV.
Find the right allocation for BCGD and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer