PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGD vs. BCFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGD vs. BCFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGD achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than BCFN's -17.02% return.


BCGD

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.41%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCFN

1D
-2.00%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGD vs. BCFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCGD
Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF
2.41%0.92%
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
-17.02%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGD and BCFN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGD vs. BCFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Global Durable Advantage ETF (BCGD) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCGD vs. BCFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCGDBCFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-1.70

+2.11

Drawdowns

BCGD vs. BCFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGD drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum BCFN drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGD and BCFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGDBCFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-20.95%

+7.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-19.09%

+17.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-12.17%

+8.93%

Volatility

BCGD vs. BCFN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGDBCFNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

19.41%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

19.41%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

19.41%

-1.54%

BCGD vs. BCFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFN's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGD vs. BCFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCGD nor BCFN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCGD and BCFN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCGD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCGD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

BCGD and BCFN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BCGD is categorized as Global Equities, while BCFN is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCGD and 0.80% for BCFN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGD and BCFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer