BCFU.DE vs. TLT
BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFU.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCFU.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs -6.27%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BCFU.DE charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.05% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- -1.67%
- 5Y*
- -6.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 17.70% | 19.44% | 4.91% | -5.62% | 16.93% | 32.04% | 1.23% | 6.92% | -6.42% | 5.98% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.05% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and TLT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.10 |
The correlation between BCFU.DE and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
TLT
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.07 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 0.46 | +4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.49 | 1.14 | +12.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.36 | +1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | -0.40 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.26 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -48.35% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -7.58% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -19.18% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -43.70% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -40.31% | +35.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -13.82% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 3.05% | -0.64% |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.71%. This indicates that BCFU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 2.71% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 6.50% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.96% | 9.77% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 15.86% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 14.90% | -0.35% |
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
BCFU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFU.DE and TLT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
BCFU.DE is categorized as Commodities, while TLT is Government Bonds. BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for BCFU.DE and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for BCFU.DE and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer