BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE).
BCFU.DE and XCMC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BCFU.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. It was launched on May 25, 2017. XCMC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Nov 3, 2021. Both BCFU.DE and XCMC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 11.76% | 19.44% | 4.91% | -5.62% | 16.93% | 0.23% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 22.16% | 9.89% | 5.52% | -6.48% | 17.97% | -13.38% |
Different Trading Currencies
BCFU.DE is traded in USD, while XCMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XCMC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFU.DE achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 22.16% return.
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 11.76%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- —
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 22.16%
- 6M
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFU.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFU.DE
XCMC.DE
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCFU.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.28 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 1.73 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.81 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 7.86 | +1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFU.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.28 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.40 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFU.DE and XCMC.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFU.DE nor XCMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFU.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.81%, which is greater than XCMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFU.DE and XCMC.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFU.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.81% | -22.91% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -11.15% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -3.58% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -13.09% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 3.77% | -1.35% |
Volatility
BCFU.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) at 5.38%. This indicates that BCFU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BCFU.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.38% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 14.30% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 17.60% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 17.58% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 17.58% | -3.05% |