BCFN vs. TRUF
BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCFN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
BCFN vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCFN
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- YTD
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFN vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | 7.90% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFN and TRUF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFN vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCFN vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFN | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -3.24% | -17.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.18% | -0.76% | -11.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.76% | -1.13% | -11.63% |
Volatility
BCFN vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFN | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 14.02% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 14.02% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 14.02% | +5.25% |
BCFN vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFN vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | 0.00% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFN and TRUF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.
TRUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for BCFN and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer