PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFN vs. TRUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFN vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCFN

1D
0.35%
1M
6.19%
6M
-11.14%
YTD
-9.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUF

1D
0.37%
1M
4.76%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and TRUF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFN vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFN vs. TRUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and TRUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFNTRUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-3.24%

-17.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.18%

-0.76%

-11.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.76%

-1.13%

-11.63%

Volatility

BCFN vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFNTRUFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

14.02%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

14.02%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

14.02%

+5.25%

BCFN vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFN vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison

BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCFN and TRUF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

TRUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.

They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.10% for TRUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFN and TRUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer