BCFN vs. KBE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) and KBE (SPDR S&P Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BCFN tracks the Actively Managed while KBE tracks the S&P Banks Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBE.

Performance

BCFN vs. KBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than KBE's 2.87% return.

BCFN

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -4.60%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBE

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -1.94%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 4.27%
• 1Y: 18.75%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: 5.28%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. KBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCFN Baron Financials ETF	-17.02%	0.35%
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF	2.87%	-2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and KBE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

BCFN vs. KBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBE

KBE Risk / Return Rank: 25
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFN vs. KBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCFN	KBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.70	0.10	-1.80

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. KBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum KBE drawdown of -83.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and KBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCFN	KBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-83.15%	+62.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.63%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.09%	-7.38%	-11.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.17%	-27.54%	+15.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCFN	KBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.41%	21.62%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	27.36%	-7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	29.85%	-10.44%

BCFN vs. KBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KBE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCFN vs. KBE - Dividend Comparison

BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCFN Baron Financials ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBE SPDR S&P Bank ETF	2.39%	2.51%	2.35%	2.78%	2.99%	2.16%	2.44%	2.33%	2.18%	1.36%	1.39%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCFN and KBE in my portfolio?

BCFN and KBE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCFN or KBE?

On fees, KBE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCFN or KBE?

KBE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCFN or KBE?

KBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.

What is the main difference between BCFN and KBE?

BCFN tracks Actively Managed, while KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.35% for KBE.