PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFN vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFN vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCFN

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.55%
YTD
-14.62%
6M
-15.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
-0.55%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and BPH is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFN vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFN vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFNBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-9.43%

-11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.74%

-8.71%

-8.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-3.18%

-9.42%

Volatility

BCFN vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFNBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

24.10%

-5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

24.10%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

24.10%

-5.13%

BCFN vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFN vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCFN and BPH have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.

BCFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFN and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer