BCE vs. DGRW
BCE (BCE Inc.) is a stock, while DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) is Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, BCE returned -1.72%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for DGRW. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCE achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BCE has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of -1.72%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.
BCE
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 1Y
- -4.57%
- 3Y*
- -14.16%
- 5Y*
- -8.91%
- 10Y*
- -1.72%
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
BCE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | -4.67% | 10.25% | -35.53% | -4.16% | -10.62% | 28.62% | -1.95% | 23.38% | -13.02% | 16.52% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 9.02% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCE and DGRW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013 | 0.39 |
The correlation between BCE and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
BCE
DGRW
BCE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BCE Inc. (BCE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.29 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.92 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 7.92 | -8.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCE drawdown since its inception was -60.67%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCE and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.67% | -32.04% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.07% | -8.30% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.10% | -16.21% | -28.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.42% | -17.27% | -38.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | -32.04% | -23.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.49% | -0.89% | -48.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -3.01% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 2.01% | +5.36% |
Volatility
BCE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
BCE Inc. (BCE) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.54%. This indicates that BCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCE | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 2.54% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 8.21% | +6.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.51% | 10.20% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 14.00% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 16.17% | +3.18% |
Dividends
BCE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
BCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCE BCE Inc. | 5.68% | 6.98% | 12.47% | 7.29% | 6.39% | 5.37% | 5.82% | 5.16% | 5.84% | 4.63% | 5.15% | 6.00% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCE and DGRW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCE has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to DGRW (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCE dropped -60.67% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCE and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer