PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCCC vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCCC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -21.49% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


BCCC

1D
-2.78%
1M
-14.90%
YTD
-21.49%
6M
-22.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
-21.49%-7.14%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and SPY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCCC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCCC

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCCC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCCC vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCCCSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.78

0.59

-1.37

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCCCSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-55.19%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.25%

-0.70%

-36.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-9.05%

-7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

BCCC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCCCSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.07%

11.83%

+23.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.07%

17.05%

+18.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.07%

17.94%

+17.13%

BCCC vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCCC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.51%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCCC
Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
62.51%29.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCCC and SPY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 62.51%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

BCCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.09% for SPY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCCC and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer