BCCC vs. SOFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X, while SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. BCCC is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.

Performance

BCCC vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -21.49% return, which is significantly lower than SOFR's 1.45% return.

BCCC

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -14.90%
• YTD: -21.49%
• 6M: -22.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-21.49%	-7.14%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	1.45%	2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and SOFR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.06

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 97
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCCC vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCCC	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	4.96	-5.74

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and SOFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	SOFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-0.41%	-41.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.25%	-0.14%	-37.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.84%	-0.03%	-16.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	SOFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.07%	0.84%	+34.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.07%	0.84%	+34.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.07%	0.84%	+34.23%

BCCC vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCCC vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.51%, more than SOFR's 3.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	62.51%	29.55%	0.00%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.95%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCCC and SOFR in my portfolio?

BCCC and SOFR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCCC or SOFR?

On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCCC or SOFR?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCCC or SOFR?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 62.51%, compared with 3.95% for SOFR.

What is the main difference between BCCC and SOFR?

BCCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.20% for SOFR.