PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAAX vs. XILSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 7.97% return.


BCAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
10Y*

XILSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.97%
YTD
7.97%
6M
10.49%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
0.33%5.27%8.92%11.47%-9.47%1.04%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
7.97%18.70%18.93%18.65%1.23%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAAX and XILSX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAAX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAAX
BCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XILSX
XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCAAXXILSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-78.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

43.21

-41.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

117.99

-116.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

805.46

-797.61

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAAX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCAAXXILSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

8.17

-6.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.63

-0.80

Drawdowns

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum XILSX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and XILSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAAXXILSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.21%

-14.53%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-0.21%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.71%

-2.36%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.91%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.03%

+0.54%

Volatility

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that BCAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAAXXILSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.43%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

2.11%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

3.08%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

3.77%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

3.93%

+0.11%

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCAAX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
5.61%6.27%6.87%4.68%4.99%3.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XILSX
Pioneer ILS Interval Fund
8.81%9.51%13.06%12.82%2.68%2.04%5.20%6.63%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCAAX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAAX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAAX dropped -13.21% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAAX and XILSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer