BCAAX vs. BUFHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BCAAX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund) and BUFHX (Buffalo High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BCAAX returned 7.34%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for BUFHX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCAAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BUFHX.

Performance

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than BUFHX's 1.80% return.

BCAAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.95%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: 8.42%
• 5Y*: 4.90%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund	0.33%	5.27%	8.92%	11.47%	-9.47%	1.04%
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund	1.80%	5.11%	10.35%	11.68%	-5.53%	1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAAX and BUFHX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021	0.73

The correlation between BCAAX and BUFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCAAX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAAX

BCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 37
BCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BUFHX

BUFHX Risk / Return Rank: 52
BUFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BUFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BUFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BUFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BUFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BCAAX	BUFHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.10	-0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.19	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.45	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.44	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.03	10.33	-1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BUFHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAAX and BUFHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCAAX	BUFHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	2.10	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.52	-0.68

Drawdowns

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and BUFHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCAAX	BUFHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-26.01%	+12.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-2.13%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.71%	-3.83%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-2.03%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	0.50%	+0.07%

Volatility

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) at 0.69%. This indicates that BCAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCAAX	BUFHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	0.69%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.27%	1.96%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	2.49%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	3.14%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	4.04%	0.00%

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison

BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than BUFHX's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund	5.61%	6.27%	6.87%	4.68%	4.99%	3.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund	6.94%	6.84%	8.03%	6.41%	8.05%	7.24%	4.11%	4.21%	5.17%	4.57%	3.85%	5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCAAX and BUFHX in my portfolio?

BCAAX and BUFHX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCAAX or BUFHX?

BCAAX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to BUFHX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAAX dropped -13.21% vs BUFHX's -26.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.