BCAAX vs. BUFHX
BCAAX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund) and BUFHX (Buffalo High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BCAAX returned 6.35%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for BUFHX. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCAAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BUFHX.
Performance
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than BUFHX's 2.08% return.
BCAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 2.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.15%
BUFHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | -0.16% | 5.27% | 8.92% | 11.47% | -9.47% | 1.04% |
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | 2.08% | 5.11% | 10.35% | 11.68% | -5.53% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCAAX and BUFHX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BCAAX and BUFHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCAAX vs. BUFHX — Risk / Return Rank
BCAAX
BUFHX
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCAAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 6.70 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum BUFHX drawdown of -26.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and BUFHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCAAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -26.01% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -2.13% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.71% | -3.83% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.30% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -2.02% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) is 0.51%, while Buffalo High Yield Fund (BUFHX) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that BCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCAAX | BUFHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 0.56% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 2.00% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84% | 2.52% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 3.14% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 4.02% | -0.03% |
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFHX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCAAX vs. BUFHX - Dividend Comparison
BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than BUFHX's 7.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | 5.09% | 6.27% | 6.87% | 4.68% | 4.99% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFHX Buffalo High Yield Fund | 7.07% | 6.84% | 8.03% | 6.41% | 8.05% | 7.24% | 4.11% | 4.21% | 5.17% | 4.57% | 3.85% | 5.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCAAX and BUFHX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFHX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to BCAAX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAAX dropped -13.21% vs BUFHX's -26.01%.
BUFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCAAX and BUFHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer