BCAAX vs. CPHYX
BCAAX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund) and CPHYX (Principal High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BCAAX returned 7.34%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for CPHYX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCAAX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for CPHYX.
Performance
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CPHYX's 1.55% return.
BCAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPHYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.10%
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | 0.33% | 5.27% | 8.92% | 11.47% | -9.47% | 1.04% |
CPHYX Principal High Yield Fund | 1.55% | 6.68% | 7.09% | 11.27% | -9.32% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCAAX and CPHYX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between BCAAX and CPHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCAAX vs. CPHYX — Risk / Return Rank
BCAAX
CPHYX
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and Principal High Yield Fund (CPHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCAAX | CPHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.92 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 3.31 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.62 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 13.28 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCAAX | CPHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.92 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.13 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum CPHYX drawdown of -27.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and CPHYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCAAX | CPHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -27.79% | +14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -2.61% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.71% | -4.48% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -2.62% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.52% | +0.05% |
Volatility
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) is 0.82%, while Principal High Yield Fund (CPHYX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that BCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCAAX | CPHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 0.88% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.27% | 2.54% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 3.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 4.77% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 5.37% | -1.33% |
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CPHYX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCAAX vs. CPHYX - Dividend Comparison
BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than CPHYX's 6.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | 5.61% | 6.27% | 6.87% | 4.68% | 4.99% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CPHYX Principal High Yield Fund | 6.56% | 6.46% | 6.23% | 4.70% | 4.56% | 4.72% | 4.82% | 5.50% | 6.18% | 4.90% | 5.62% | 6.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCAAX and CPHYX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPHYX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to BCAAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAAX dropped -13.21% vs CPHYX's -27.79%.
CPHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCAAX and CPHYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer