XILSX vs. NHS
Compare and contrast key facts about Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS).
XILSX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Dec 16, 2014. NHS is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jul 28, 2003.
Performance
XILSX vs. NHS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XILSX vs. NHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 5.18% | 18.70% | 18.93% | 18.65% | 1.23% | -1.10% | 7.37% | 2.60% | -2.11% | -8.83% |
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | -9.61% | 14.81% | 11.04% | 6.12% | -22.99% | 15.78% | 4.57% | 39.03% | -11.45% | 5.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XILSX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than NHS's -9.61% return.
XILSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
NHS
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -14.96%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -6.96%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XILSX vs. NHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XILSX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than NHS's 4.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XILSX vs. NHS — Risk / Return Rank
XILSX
NHS
XILSX vs. NHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XILSX | NHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 8.38 | -0.11 | +8.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 71.70 | -0.04 | +71.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 31.20 | 0.99 | +30.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 120.30 | -0.11 | +120.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 749.82 | -0.50 | +750.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XILSX | NHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38 | -0.11 | +8.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.19 | -0.05 | +3.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.35 | +1.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between XILSX and NHS is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XILSX vs. NHS - Dividend Comparison
XILSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, less than NHS's 16.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund | 9.04% | 9.51% | 13.06% | 12.82% | 2.68% | 2.04% | 5.20% | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | 16.76% | 14.60% | 14.50% | 13.94% | 12.75% | 8.74% | 9.29% | 7.99% | 8.37% | 7.59% | 8.23% | 9.81% |
Drawdowns
XILSX vs. NHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XILSX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum NHS drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XILSX and NHS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XILSX | NHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -64.67% | +50.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.21% | -17.43% | +17.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.27% | -37.43% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.07% | +15.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -8.82% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 3.89% | -3.86% |
Volatility
XILSX vs. NHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) is 0.73%, while Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that XILSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XILSX | NHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 6.16% | -5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 11.02% | -8.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04% | 16.02% | -12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 16.17% | -12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 16.68% | -12.73% |