PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BCAAX vs. BGHSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BCAAX and BGHSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
20.60%
32.08%
BCAAX
BGHSX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BCAAX:

3.37

BGHSX:

3.37

Sortino Ratio

BCAAX:

6.32

BGHSX:

6.07

Omega Ratio

BCAAX:

1.92

BGHSX:

1.87

Calmar Ratio

BCAAX:

6.14

BGHSX:

5.91

Martin Ratio

BCAAX:

23.28

BGHSX:

22.87

Ulcer Index

BCAAX:

0.40%

BGHSX:

0.46%

Daily Std Dev

BCAAX:

2.69%

BGHSX:

3.04%

Max Drawdown

BCAAX:

-36.67%

BGHSX:

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

BCAAX:

-0.09%

BGHSX:

-0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAAX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BGHSX's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BCAAX has underperformed BGHSX with an annualized return of 1.86%, while BGHSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.65% annualized return.


BCAAX

YTD

0.56%

1M

0.47%

6M

4.32%

1Y

8.68%

5Y*

2.71%

10Y*

1.86%

BGHSX

YTD

0.78%

1M

0.68%

6M

5.04%

1Y

9.83%

5Y*

3.46%

10Y*

2.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAAX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than BGHSX's 0.54% expense ratio.


BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
Expense ratio chart for BCAAX: current value at 0.86% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.86%
Expense ratio chart for BGHSX: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BCAAX vs. BGHSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCAAX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCAAX is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCAAX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCAAX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCAAX is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCAAX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BGHSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGHSX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCAAX, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.003.373.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCAAX, currently valued at 6.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.006.326.07
The chart of Omega ratio for BCAAX, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.921.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCAAX, currently valued at 6.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.145.91
The chart of Martin ratio for BCAAX, currently valued at 23.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0023.2822.87
BCAAX
BGHSX

The current BCAAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the BGHSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAAX and BGHSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio3.003.504.004.505.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.37
3.37
BCAAX
BGHSX

Dividends

BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Dividend Comparison

BCAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than BGHSX's 6.71% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
6.26%6.85%6.24%5.45%2.48%
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
6.71%7.39%6.95%6.34%3.10%

Drawdowns

BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAAX drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than BGHSX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAAX and BGHSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-1.20%-1.00%-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.09%
-0.10%
BCAAX
BGHSX

Volatility

BCAAX vs. BGHSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) is 0.86%, while BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a volatility of 0.92%. This indicates that BCAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.86%
0.92%
BCAAX
BGHSX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab