PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BC vs. REVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BC vs. REVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brunswick Corporation (BC) and REV Group, Inc. (REVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than REVG's 5.08% return.


BC

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.53%
YTD
11.31%
6M
20.93%
1Y
68.40%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
-1.35%
10Y*
7.62%

REVG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.08%
6M
19.40%
1Y
75.51%
3Y*
90.70%
5Y*
33.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BC vs. REVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BC
Brunswick Corporation
11.31%18.05%-31.75%36.90%-27.11%33.82%29.16%31.38%-14.77%-4.96%
REVG
REV Group, Inc.
5.08%91.79%108.93%46.01%-9.35%62.15%-26.83%65.71%-76.63%30.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BC and REVG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2017

0.44

The correlation between BC and REVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BC:

-$2.75

REVG:

$1.93

PS Ratio

BC:

0.73

REVG:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

BC:

$5.52B

REVG:

$2.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BC:

$1.03B

REVG:

$369.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

BC:

$190.90M

REVG:

$168.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BC vs. REVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BC
BC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

REVG
REVG Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
REVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
REVG Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
REVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
REVG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BC vs. REVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and REV Group, Inc. (REVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCREVGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.36

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

3.53

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.55

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.86

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.58

8.08

-0.50

BC vs. REVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BC Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the REVG Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BC and REVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCREVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.36

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.78

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.27

-0.04

Drawdowns

BC vs. REVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, which is greater than REVG's maximum drawdown of -88.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and REVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCREVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.60%

-88.07%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.38%

-23.48%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.47%

-23.48%

-32.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.77%

-48.36%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.47%

-7.32%

-14.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.22%

-40.95%

+12.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

8.32%

+0.31%

Volatility

BC vs. REVG - Volatility Comparison

Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to REV Group, Inc. (REVG) at 0.00%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCREVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.63%

0.00%

+13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.37%

14.01%

+13.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.41%

33.64%

+6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.06%

43.99%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.77%

51.61%

-11.84%

Dividends

BC vs. REVG - Dividend Comparison

BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than REVG's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BC
Brunswick Corporation
2.13%2.32%2.60%1.65%2.03%1.27%1.30%1.45%1.68%1.24%1.13%1.04%
REVG
REV Group, Inc.
0.28%0.39%10.07%1.10%1.58%1.06%1.14%1.64%2.66%0.46%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BC vs. REVG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and REV Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.38B
664.40M
(BC) Total Revenue
(REVG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BC vs. REVG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brunswick Corporation and REV Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%202220232024202520260
15.4%
Portfolio components
BC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

REVG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.60M and revenue of 664.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

BC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 50.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

REVG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.60M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.

BC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

REVG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.90M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BC and REVG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BC has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to REVG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BC dropped -95.60% vs REVG's -88.07%.

REVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BC and REVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer