BC vs. REVG
BC (Brunswick Corporation) and REVG (REV Group, Inc.) are both stocks. BC operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while REVG operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, BC returned -1.35%/yr vs 33.74%/yr for REVG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BC vs. REVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than REVG's 5.08% return.
BC
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 20.93%
- 1Y
- 68.40%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.62%
REVG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 75.51%
- 3Y*
- 90.70%
- 5Y*
- 33.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BC vs. REVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC Brunswick Corporation | 11.31% | 18.05% | -31.75% | 36.90% | -27.11% | 33.82% | 29.16% | 31.38% | -14.77% | -4.96% |
REVG REV Group, Inc. | 5.08% | 91.79% | 108.93% | 46.01% | -9.35% | 62.15% | -26.83% | 65.71% | -76.63% | 30.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BC and REVG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between BC and REVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BC:
-$2.75
REVG:
$1.93
BC:
0.73
REVG:
1.28
BC:
$5.52B
REVG:
$2.46B
BC:
$1.03B
REVG:
$369.80M
BC:
$190.90M
REVG:
$168.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BC vs. REVG — Risk / Return Rank
BC
REVG
BC vs. REVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and REV Group, Inc. (REVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BC | REVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 2.36 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 3.53 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.55 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.86 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 8.08 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BC | REVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.36 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.78 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.27 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BC vs. REVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, which is greater than REVG's maximum drawdown of -88.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and REVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BC | REVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.60% | -88.07% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.38% | -23.48% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -23.48% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.77% | -48.36% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.47% | -7.32% | -14.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.22% | -40.95% | +12.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.63% | 8.32% | +0.31% |
Volatility
BC vs. REVG - Volatility Comparison
Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to REV Group, Inc. (REVG) at 0.00%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BC | REVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 0.00% | +13.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.37% | 14.01% | +13.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.41% | 33.64% | +6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.06% | 43.99% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 51.61% | -11.84% |
Dividends
BC vs. REVG - Dividend Comparison
BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than REVG's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC Brunswick Corporation | 2.13% | 2.32% | 2.60% | 1.65% | 2.03% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.04% |
REVG REV Group, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.39% | 10.07% | 1.10% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.64% | 2.66% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BC vs. REVG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and REV Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BC vs. REVG - Profitability Comparison
BC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
REVG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 102.60M and revenue of 664.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
BC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 50.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
REVG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.60M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
BC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
REVG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, REV Group, Inc. reported a net income of 28.90M and revenue of 664.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BC and REVG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BC has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to REVG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BC dropped -95.60% vs REVG's -88.07%.
REVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BC and REVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer