BC vs. GPK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK).

Performance

BC vs. GPK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BC vs. GPK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BC Brunswick Corporation	-1.51%	18.05%	-31.75%	36.90%	-27.11%	33.82%	29.16%	31.38%	-14.77%	2.54%
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company	-33.25%	-43.33%	11.73%	12.65%	15.87%	16.97%	3.93%	59.84%	-29.60%	28.07%

Fundamentals

EPS BC : -$3.11 GPK : $1.49
PS Ratio BC : 0.60 GPK : 0.34
Total Revenue (TTM) BC : $5.36B GPK : $8.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) BC : $1.02B GPK : $1.31B
EBITDA (TTM) BC : $182.60M GPK : $1.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly higher than GPK's -33.25% return. Over the past 10 years, BC has outperformed GPK with an annualized return of 6.01%, while GPK has yielded a comparatively lower -0.58% annualized return.

BC

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -8.62%
• YTD: -1.51%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 38.70%
• 3Y*: -1.68%
• 5Y*: -3.63%
• 10Y*: 6.01%

GPK

• 1D: 5.63%
• 1M: -17.80%
• YTD: -33.25%
• 6M: -48.27%
• 1Y: -60.59%
• 3Y*: -25.48%
• 5Y*: -9.92%
• 10Y*: -0.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BC vs. GPK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BC

BC Risk / Return Rank: 70
BC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GPK

GPK Risk / Return Rank: 2
GPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GPK Omega Ratio Rank: 1
GPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GPK Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BC vs. GPK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BC	GPK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	-1.47	+2.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	-2.50	+3.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.67	+0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	-0.93	+2.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	-1.82	+6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BC vs. GPK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BC Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the GPK Sharpe Ratio of -1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BC and GPK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BC	GPK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	-1.47	+2.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	-0.33	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	-0.02	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.03	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BC and GPK is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BC vs. GPK - Dividend Comparison

BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than GPK's 4.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BC Brunswick Corporation	2.38%	2.32%	2.60%	1.65%	2.03%	1.27%	1.30%	1.45%	1.68%	1.24%	1.13%	1.04%
GPK Graphic Packaging Holding Company	4.43%	2.92%	1.47%	1.62%	1.46%	1.54%	1.77%	1.80%	2.82%	2.91%	1.80%	1.56%

Drawdowns

BC vs. GPK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, roughly equal to the maximum GPK drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and GPK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BC	GPK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.60%	-98.11%	+2.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.53%	-65.13%	+40.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.99%	-69.71%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.99%	-69.71%	+8.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.51%	-66.20%	+35.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-57.08%	+28.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.42%	33.49%	-24.07%

Volatility

BC vs. GPK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brunswick Corporation (BC) is 12.15%, while Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that BC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BC	GPK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.15%	13.52%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.38%	33.77%	-5.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.61%	41.30%	+5.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.77%	29.82%	+7.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.61%	28.78%	+10.83%

Financials

BC vs. GPK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brunswick Corporation and Graphic Packaging Holding Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GPK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 41.90M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

GPK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 156.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

BC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 18.60M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

GPK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of 71.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.