PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BC vs. GPK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BCGPK
YTD Return-14.29%17.38%
1Y Return10.73%31.82%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.28%13.26%
5Y Return (Ann)8.52%13.52%
10Y Return (Ann)7.10%11.23%
Sharpe Ratio0.541.40
Sortino Ratio1.032.02
Omega Ratio1.121.25
Calmar Ratio0.512.06
Martin Ratio1.157.31
Ulcer Index16.08%4.95%
Daily Std Dev34.64%25.91%
Max Drawdown-95.60%-96.60%
Current Drawdown-24.95%-6.13%

Fundamentals


BCGPK
Market Cap$5.31B$8.82B
EPS$4.29$2.32
PE Ratio18.7412.54
PEG Ratio1.491.13
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.44B$8.96B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.43B$2.04B
EBITDA (TTM)$706.60M$936.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between BC and GPK is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BC vs. GPK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a -14.29% return, which is significantly lower than GPK's 17.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BC has underperformed GPK with an annualized return of 7.10%, while GPK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.93%
2.82%
BC
GPK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BC vs. GPK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BC, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BC, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BC, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BC, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.51
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.15
GPK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GPK, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GPK, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GPK, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GPK, currently valued at 2.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GPK, currently valued at 7.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.31

BC vs. GPK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BC Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GPK Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BC and GPK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.54
1.40
BC
GPK

Dividends

BC vs. GPK - Dividend Comparison

BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than GPK's 1.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BC
Brunswick Corporation
2.03%1.65%2.03%1.27%1.30%1.45%1.68%1.24%1.13%1.04%0.88%0.22%
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
1.40%1.62%1.46%1.54%1.77%1.80%2.82%2.43%1.80%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BC vs. GPK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, roughly equal to the maximum GPK drawdown of -96.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and GPK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.95%
-6.13%
BC
GPK

Volatility

BC vs. GPK - Volatility Comparison

Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) at 8.38%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.59%
8.38%
BC
GPK

Financials

BC vs. GPK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and Graphic Packaging Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items