PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BC vs. WGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BC vs. WGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than WGO's -27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BC has outperformed WGO with an annualized return of 8.33%, while WGO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.18% annualized return.


BC

1D
-2.45%
1M
0.69%
YTD
10.98%
6M
7.56%
1Y
50.61%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
8.33%

WGO

1D
-1.22%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-27.95%
6M
-31.19%
1Y
-5.46%
3Y*
-20.02%
5Y*
-13.45%
10Y*
4.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BC vs. WGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BC
Brunswick Corporation
10.98%18.05%-31.75%36.90%-27.11%33.82%29.16%31.38%-14.77%2.54%
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
-27.95%-11.86%-33.08%40.87%-28.69%25.97%14.19%121.91%-56.04%77.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BC and WGO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1984

0.39

Over the past year, BC and WGO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BC:

-$2.75

WGO:

$1.47

PS Ratio

BC:

0.73

WGO:

0.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

BC:

$5.52B

WGO:

$2.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BC:

$1.03B

WGO:

$379.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

BC:

$190.90M

WGO:

$121.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BC vs. WGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BC
BC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

WGO
WGO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BC vs. WGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCWGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.03

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

-0.13

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

-0.25

+6.05

BC vs. WGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BC Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the WGO Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BC and WGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BC vs. WGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, roughly equal to the maximum WGO drawdown of -91.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and WGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCWGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.60%

-91.48%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.38%

-43.84%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.47%

-60.53%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.77%

-61.01%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.99%

-67.12%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.70%

-63.25%

+41.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.21%

-40.72%

+12.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.75%

21.51%

-12.76%

Volatility

BC vs. WGO - Volatility Comparison

Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Winnebago Industries, Inc. (WGO) at 9.51%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCWGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.37%

9.51%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.19%

28.35%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

52.24%

-11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.20%

44.40%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.85%

48.73%

-8.88%

Dividends

BC vs. WGO - Dividend Comparison

BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than WGO's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BC
Brunswick Corporation
2.13%2.32%2.60%1.65%2.03%1.27%1.30%1.45%1.68%1.24%1.13%1.04%
WGO
Winnebago Industries, Inc.
4.94%3.38%2.66%1.54%1.54%0.72%0.75%0.83%1.65%0.72%1.26%1.86%

Financials

BC vs. WGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and Winnebago Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.38B
657.40M
(BC) Total Revenue
(WGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BC vs. WGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brunswick Corporation and Winnebago Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%202220232024202520260
13.0%
Portfolio components
BC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 85.60M and revenue of 657.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.0%.

BC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 50.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

WGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.80M and revenue of 657.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

BC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

WGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Winnebago Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 4.80M and revenue of 657.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BC and WGO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BC has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to WGO (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BC dropped -95.60% vs WGO's -91.48%.

BC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BC and WGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer