BC vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BC or MSFT.
Key characteristics
| BC | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -14.29% | 13.69% |
| 1Y Return | 10.73% | 15.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.28% | 9.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.52% | 24.40% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.10% | 25.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.54 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.03 | 1.21 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.12 | 1.16 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.51 | 1.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.15 | 2.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 16.08% | 6.34% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.64% | 19.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.60% | -69.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.95% | -8.90% |
Fundamentals
| BC | MSFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.31B | $3.15T |
| EPS | $4.29 | $12.12 |
| PE Ratio | 18.74 | 34.90 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.49 | 2.21 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $5.44B | $254.19B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.43B | $176.28B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $706.60M | $139.70B |
Correlation
The correlation between BC and MSFT is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BC vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a -14.29% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 13.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BC has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 7.10%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BC vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BC vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than MSFT's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC Brunswick Corporation | 2.03% | 1.65% | 2.03% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.04% | 0.88% | 0.22% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.53% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
BC vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BC vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 7.77%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BC vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities