BC vs. MSFT
BC (Brunswick Corporation) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. BC operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BC returned 6.48%/yr vs 23.47%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BC vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BC achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BC has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 6.48%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.47% annualized return.
BC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- -0.41%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -17.70%
- YTD
- -18.79%
- 1Y
- -21.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 23.47%
BC vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC Brunswick Corporation | 5.26% | 18.05% | -31.75% | 36.90% | -27.11% | 33.82% | 29.16% | 31.38% | -14.77% | 2.54% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.79% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BC and MSFT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1986 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BC and MSFT has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BC:
$5.00B
MSFT:
$2.90T
BC:
-$3.10
MSFT:
$16.79
BC:
0.61
MSFT:
9.16
BC:
$5.52B
MSFT:
$318.27B
BC:
$1.03B
MSFT:
$217.41B
BC:
$190.90M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BC vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
BC
MSFT
BC vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brunswick Corporation (BC) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BC | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.63 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.43 | -1.18 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BC vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BC drawdown since its inception was -95.60%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BC | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.60% | -69.38% | -26.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.38% | -34.50% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -34.50% | -21.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.77% | -37.15% | -20.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.99% | -37.15% | -23.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.74% | -27.41% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -21.80% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 18.36% | -9.38% |
Volatility
BC vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Brunswick Corporation (BC) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 10.62%. This indicates that BC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BC | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.18% | 10.62% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.56% | 24.24% | +3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.52% | 27.18% | +13.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.31% | 27.01% | +11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.72% | 27.17% | +12.55% |
Dividends
BC vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
BC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC Brunswick Corporation | 2.78% | 2.32% | 2.60% | 1.65% | 2.03% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.04% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
BC vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brunswick Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BC vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
BC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
BC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported an operating income of 50.30M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
BC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brunswick Corporation reported a net income of 21.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BC and MSFT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BC has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to MSFT (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BC dropped -95.60% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
BC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BC and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer