BBUS vs. QUS
BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 12.56%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
BBUS vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.98%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 19.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.15M | $23.57M | $29.57M | |
| $3.01M | $4.81M | $3.43M |
BBUS vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 11.30% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 10.23% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and QUS is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BBUS and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBUS vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
QUS
Financial Services
BBUS
QUS
Communication Services
BBUS
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
QUS
Healthcare
BBUS
QUS
Industrials
BBUS
QUS
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
QUS
Energy
BBUS
QUS
Utilities
BBUS
QUS
Real Estate
BBUS
QUS
Basic Materials
BBUS
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
QUS
BBUS vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.90 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | 12.95 | -2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -33.78% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -6.85% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -13.94% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -22.30% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -3.66% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.53% | +0.65% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that BBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.42% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 6.97% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.87% | 9.22% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 14.32% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 16.40% | +3.10% |
BBUS vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBUS vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBUS and QUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBUS has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.56% vs 10.91% for QUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.
BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer