BBUS vs. OILK
BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.43%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
BBUS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.17 |
The correlation between BBUS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBUS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BBUS
OILK
-
Financial Services
BBUS
OILK
-
Communication Services
BBUS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
OILK
Healthcare
BBUS
OILK
-
Industrials
BBUS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
OILK
-
Energy
BBUS
OILK
-
Utilities
BBUS
OILK
-
Real Estate
BBUS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
BBUS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
OILK
BBUS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.42 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 6.91 | +6.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.06 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.59 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.12 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -83.76% | +48.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -17.35% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -23.42% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -34.69% | +9.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -3.66% | +2.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -32.61% | +27.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 8.56% | -6.56% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 2.88%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 10.44% | -7.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 23.26% | -14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 28.75% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 30.12% | -13.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 35.97% | -16.38% |
BBUS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBUS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBUS and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.
BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.68% for OILK.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer