BBSOX vs. FCNVX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BBSOX (BlackRock Short Obligations Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, BBSOX returned 2.48%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for FCNVX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBSOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.

Performance

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSOX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BBSOX has underperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 2.48%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.

BBSOX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 1.72%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: 2.48%

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 5.00%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund	1.72%	4.74%	5.36%	4.36%	0.60%	-0.10%	1.54%	3.01%	1.96%	1.18%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.82%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSOX and FCNVX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.47

Return for Risk

BBSOX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSOX

BBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
BBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 100
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBSOX	FCNVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	3.49	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.87	20.15	-9.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.90	10.62	-6.72
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	20.77	41.30	-20.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	70.95	134.81	-63.86

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSOX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSOX drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum FCNVX drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSOX and FCNVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSOX	FCNVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-2.19%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.20%	-0.10%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.30%	-0.30%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.00%	-0.59%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-1.59%	-2.19%	+0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.05%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.06%	0.03%	+0.03%

Volatility

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.37%. This indicates that BBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSOX	FCNVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	0.37%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.91%	0.80%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30%	1.18%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.27%	1.30%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.03%	1.05%	-0.02%

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSOX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

BBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FCNVX's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund	4.21%	4.43%	5.01%	3.35%	1.29%	0.30%	1.13%	2.56%	2.24%	1.17%	1.03%	0.62%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	4.10%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSOX and FCNVX in my portfolio?

BBSOX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBSOX or FCNVX?

BBSOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to FCNVX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSOX dropped -1.59% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.