BBSB vs. BLST
BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.
Performance
BBSB vs. BLST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSB achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.25% return.
BBSB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSB vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 0.47% | 2.49% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.25% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSB and BLST is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
BBSB vs. BLST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBSB
BLST
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
BBSB
BLST
-
Basic Materials
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Consumer Defensive
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Energy
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Financial Services
BBSB
-
BLST
Healthcare
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Industrials
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Real Estate
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Technology
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Utilities
BBSB
-
BLST
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSB vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank
BBSB
BLST
BBSB vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSB | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSB | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.35 | 1.51 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
BBSB vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSB drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum BLST drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSB and BLST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSB | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -1.69% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.92% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.35% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | — | — |
Volatility
BBSB vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSB | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27% | 2.21% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 2.21% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.66% | 2.21% | -0.55% |
BBSB vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBSB vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison
BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than BLST's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 3.81% | 3.69% | 4.84% | 3.50% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.38% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSB and BLST have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.
BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.
BBSB is categorized as Government Bonds, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBSB and 0.23% for BLST.
Find the right allocation for BBSB and BLST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer