BBRE vs. LQD
BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBRE is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index, while LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBRE returned 5.60%/yr vs -1.00%/yr for LQD. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBRE charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LQD.
Performance
BBRE vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBRE achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -1.41% return.
BBRE
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- YTD
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.26%
LQD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 1.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.35M | $4.29M | $4.76M | |
| $3.09B | $3.13B | $2.99B |
BBRE vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 23.40% | 2.09% | 8.24% | 13.85% | -24.68% | 42.99% | -7.55% | 26.06% | -2.41% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -1.41% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBRE and LQD is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBRE vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
BBRE
LQD
BBRE vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBRE | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.08 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 0.68 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 1.76 | +7.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBRE vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBRE drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRE and LQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBRE | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -24.95% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -3.34% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -7.87% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.15% | -24.95% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.51% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.35% | -3.99% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.30% | +1.21% |
Volatility
BBRE vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.28%. This indicates that BBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBRE | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 1.28% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 4.02% | +6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 5.29% | +9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 8.64% | +10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 8.69% | +13.80% |
BBRE vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBRE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBRE vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than LQD's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.51% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.65% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBRE and LQD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBRE has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to LQD (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBRE dropped -43.61% vs LQD's -24.95%.
On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 5.60% vs -1.00% for LQD. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 5.60% return vs -1.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.
LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.51% for BBRE.
BBRE is categorized as REIT, while LQD is Corporate Bonds. BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index, while LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BBRE and 0.15% for LQD.
BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBRE and LQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer