BBRE vs. JMOM
BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBRE is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index, while JMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBRE returned 4.42%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBRE charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
BBRE vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBRE achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.
BBRE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
BBRE vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 11.77% | 2.09% | 8.24% | 13.85% | -24.68% | 42.99% | -7.55% | 26.06% | -2.60% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -12.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBRE and JMOM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BBRE and JMOM has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BBRE vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBRE
JMOM
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
BBRE
JMOM
Financial Services
BBRE
JMOM
Basic Materials
BBRE
-
JMOM
Communication Services
BBRE
-
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
BBRE
-
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
BBRE
-
JMOM
Energy
BBRE
-
JMOM
Healthcare
BBRE
-
JMOM
Industrials
BBRE
-
JMOM
Technology
BBRE
-
JMOM
Utilities
BBRE
-
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBRE vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
BBRE
JMOM
BBRE vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBRE | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.45 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 4.69 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 22.24 | -16.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBRE | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.58 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.88 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.82 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
BBRE vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBRE drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRE and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBRE | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -34.31% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -7.87% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -19.51% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.15% | -28.26% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -0.17% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -6.32% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 1.66% | +0.89% |
Volatility
BBRE vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) is 3.99%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that BBRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBRE | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 4.62% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 11.55% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 14.32% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 18.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 20.13% | +2.43% |
BBRE vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBRE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBRE vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.81% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBRE and JMOM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to BBRE (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBRE dropped -43.61% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 4.42% for BBRE. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BBRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JMOM.
BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
BBRE is categorized as REIT, while JMOM is Momentum. BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BBRE and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBRE and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer