BBP vs. FHLC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBP tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index while FHLC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BBP returned 11.61%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for FHLC. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.

Performance

BBP vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, BBP has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 11.61%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.

BBP

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -4.86%
• 6M: 13.89%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 1Y: 51.96%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 12.86%
• 10Y*: 11.61%
• ALL TIME*: 12.18%

FHLC

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 6.28%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 4.81%
• 10Y*: 9.77%
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	$934.12K	$1.05M	$1.02M
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	$13.38M	$17.91M	$16.14M

BBP vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	17.95%	33.15%	3.32%	17.88%	0.85%	-8.17%	22.24%	24.73%	-13.95%	24.07%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	6.71%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and FHLC is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014	0.70

The correlation between BBP and FHLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBP vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBP	FHLC
Healthcare	100.0%	98.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BBP vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBP

BBP Risk / Return Rank: 88
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 74
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBP vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBP	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.85	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.86	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.55	2.70	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.50	6.71	+8.79

BBP vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBP vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBP	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.32%	-28.76%	-15.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-10.38%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.09%	-16.87%	-9.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.77%	-17.73%	-20.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.32%	-28.76%	-15.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	-2.81%	-6.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.90%	-5.16%	-6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	4.16%	-0.80%

Volatility

BBP vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.94%. This indicates that BBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBP	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	4.94%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.11%	11.69%	+7.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	15.17%	+8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.43%	15.25%	+11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.35%	16.90%	+10.45%

BBP vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBP vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	1.29%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.30%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBP and FHLC in my portfolio?

BBP and FHLC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBP or FHLC?

BBP has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to FHLC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which ETF is better, BBP or FHLC?

On 10-year performance, BBP leads with 11.61% vs 9.77% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBP or FHLC?

Over the 10-year period, BBP has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 9.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBP or FHLC?

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBP or FHLC?

FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

What is the main difference between BBP and FHLC?

BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.08% for FHLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.