BBLU vs. QUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BBLU is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBLU returned 23.09%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

BBLU vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLU achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.

BBLU

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 29.32%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUS

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: 17.65%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	10.22%	18.40%	27.47%	31.11%	6.20%
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	6.67%	14.13%	18.99%	21.78%	7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and QUS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022	0.87

The correlation between BBLU and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBLU vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBLU	QUS
Technology	29.3%	26.3%
Financial Services	15.9%	14.6%
Communication Services	14.6%	10.2%
Healthcare	12.5%	13.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	9.6%	9.2%
Energy	6.1%	4.6%
Industrials	2.1%	8.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.3%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Utilities	-	3.6%

Return for Risk

BBLU vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU

BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QUS

QUS Risk / Return Rank: 57
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBLU	QUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	1.95	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	2.81	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.35	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	2.59	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.28	11.54	+4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBLU vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLU and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBLU	QUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	1.95	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	0.77	+1.03

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and QUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBLU	QUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-33.78%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-6.85%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	-13.94%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.50%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-3.70%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	1.53%	+0.28%

Volatility

BBLU vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that BBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBLU	QUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	1.78%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	6.66%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	9.09%	+2.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	14.33%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.53%	16.42%	-1.89%

BBLU vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBLU and QUS have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBLU vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	1.14%	1.25%	1.39%	1.68%	32.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	1.31%	1.38%	1.49%	1.57%	1.68%	1.27%	1.73%	1.81%	2.12%	1.86%	2.07%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBLU and QUS in my portfolio?

BBLU and QUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBLU or QUS?

BBLU has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs QUS's -33.78%.

Which ETF is better, BBLU or QUS?

On 3-year performance, BBLU leads with 23.09% vs 17.53% for QUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBLU or QUS?

Over the 3-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 23.09% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBLU or QUS?

BBLU and QUS have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBLU or QUS?

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.14% for BBLU.

What is the main difference between BBLU and QUS?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.