PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBJP vs. SCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBJP vs. SCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than SCJ's 14.35% return.


BBJP

1D
0.34%
1M
6.13%
YTD
15.37%
6M
17.26%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*

SCJ

1D
0.36%
1M
5.04%
YTD
14.35%
6M
16.37%
1Y
30.15%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. SCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
15.37%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
14.35%29.58%3.41%13.22%-12.75%-2.95%7.46%16.16%-17.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and SCJ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.89

The correlation between BBJP and SCJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBJP vs. SCJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBJP
SCJ

Industrials

26.7%
28.9%

Technology

17.8%
11.2%

Financial Services

17.1%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
14.6%

Communication Services

7.7%
2.9%

Healthcare

6.1%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
10.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
8.4%

Utilities

1.3%
2.1%

Energy

1.0%
0.8%

Industrials

BBJP
26.7%
SCJ
28.9%

Technology

BBJP
17.8%
SCJ
11.2%

Financial Services

BBJP
17.1%
SCJ
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBJP
12.6%
SCJ
14.6%

Communication Services

BBJP
7.7%
SCJ
2.9%

Healthcare

BBJP
6.1%
SCJ
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBJP
3.7%
SCJ
6.8%

Basic Materials

BBJP
3.2%
SCJ
10.1%

Real Estate

BBJP
2.7%
SCJ
8.4%

Utilities

BBJP
1.3%
SCJ
2.1%

Energy

BBJP
1.0%
SCJ
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBJP vs. SCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SCJ
SCJ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. SCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBJPSCJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.88

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.67

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.49

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.95

8.42

-0.47

BBJP vs. SCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SCJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and SCJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBJPSCJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.47

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.30

+0.15

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. SCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum SCJ drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and SCJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBJPSCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-43.52%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-12.17%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-12.43%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-33.25%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-1.82%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-10.38%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.59%

+0.45%

Volatility

BBJP vs. SCJ - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) at 4.03%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBJPSCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.03%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

13.13%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.44%

16.11%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

15.81%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

16.29%

+2.00%

BBJP vs. SCJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SCJ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBJP vs. SCJ - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than SCJ's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.65%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCJ
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF
2.75%3.14%1.79%1.99%1.18%1.87%0.89%1.85%1.44%1.45%2.73%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBJP and SCJ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBJP has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs SCJ's -43.52%.

On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.92% vs 7.36% for SCJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SCJ.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.75% for SCJ.

BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.49% for SCJ.

SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBJP and SCJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer