BBJP vs. JPLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and JPLD (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBJP is passively managed, while JPLD is actively managed. Over the past year, BBJP returned 32.02% vs 4.71% for JPLD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBJP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.

Performance

BBJP vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.04% return.

BBJP

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: 18.45%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

JPLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF	15.37%	26.55%	7.47%	2.54%
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF	1.04%	6.01%	6.49%	3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and JPLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.16

BBJP vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBJP	JPLD
Industrials	26.7%	0.1%
Technology	17.8%	7.4%
Financial Services	17.1%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	1.6%
Communication Services	7.7%	10.1%
Healthcare	6.1%	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	0.1%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.7%	7.8%
Utilities	1.3%	0.4%
Energy	1.0%	0.1%

Return for Risk

BBJP vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP

BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 48
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 48

JPLD

JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBJP	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	3.22	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	5.29	-2.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.68	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	4.71	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	21.78	-13.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBJP vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBJP	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	3.22	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	3.25	-2.80

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and JPLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBJP	JPLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-1.17%	-31.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.60%	-1.00%	-12.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.12%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.53%	-0.15%	-8.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	0.22%	+3.82%

Volatility

BBJP vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBJP	JPLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	0.37%	+3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	0.97%	+14.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.44%	1.47%	+17.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.15%	1.83%	+16.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	1.83%	+16.46%

BBJP vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBJP vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than JPLD's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF	4.65%	5.37%	2.80%	3.05%	1.52%	2.89%	1.12%	2.31%	0.65%
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF	4.21%	4.24%	4.47%	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBJP and JPLD in my portfolio?

BBJP and JPLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBJP or JPLD?

BBJP has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

Which ETF is better, BBJP or JPLD?

On 1-year performance, BBJP leads with 32.02% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBJP or JPLD?

Over the 1-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBJP or JPLD?

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBJP or JPLD?

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 4.21% for JPLD.

What is the main difference between BBJP and JPLD?

BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.24% for JPLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.