PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBJP vs. EZJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBJP vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 28.79% return.


BBJP

1D
0.34%
1M
6.13%
YTD
15.37%
6M
17.26%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*

EZJ

1D
0.84%
1M
12.78%
YTD
28.79%
6M
31.91%
1Y
58.39%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
15.37%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
28.79%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-29.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and EZJ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.96

The correlation between BBJP and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBJP vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBJP
EZJ

Industrials

26.7%
26.0%

Technology

17.8%
19.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
12.2%

Communication Services

7.7%
7.9%

Healthcare

6.1%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.3%

Utilities

1.3%
1.1%

Energy

1.0%
1.1%

Industrials

BBJP
26.7%
EZJ
26.0%

Technology

BBJP
17.8%
EZJ
19.1%

Financial Services

BBJP
17.1%
EZJ
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BBJP
12.6%
EZJ
12.2%

Communication Services

BBJP
7.7%
EZJ
7.9%

Healthcare

BBJP
6.1%
EZJ
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

BBJP
3.7%
EZJ
3.6%

Basic Materials

BBJP
3.2%
EZJ
3.0%

Real Estate

BBJP
2.7%
EZJ
2.3%

Utilities

BBJP
1.3%
EZJ
1.1%

Energy

BBJP
1.0%
EZJ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBJP vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBJPEZJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.19

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

6.72

+1.24

BBJP vs. EZJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the EZJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and EZJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBJPEZJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.48

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.21

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.23

+0.22

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and EZJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBJPEZJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-58.63%

+25.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-26.78%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-31.48%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-58.63%

+25.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-4.25%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-21.29%

+12.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

8.72%

-4.68%

Volatility

BBJP vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 4.26%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBJPEZJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

8.67%

-4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.98%

30.75%

-15.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.44%

39.75%

-20.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

36.59%

-18.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

34.54%

-16.25%

BBJP vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBJP vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than EZJ's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.65%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.60%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BBJP and EZJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZJ has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to BBJP (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs EZJ's -58.63%.

On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.92% vs 7.67% for EZJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.

BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.95% for EZJ.

BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBJP and EZJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer