BBJP vs. EZJ
BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) are both exchange-traded funds - BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBJP returned 8.92%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for EZJ. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBJP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EZJ.
Performance
BBJP vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 28.79% return.
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 28.79%
- 6M
- 31.91%
- 1Y
- 58.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
BBJP vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 15.37% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 28.79% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -29.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and EZJ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between BBJP and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBJP vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBJP
EZJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
BBJP
EZJ
Technology
BBJP
EZJ
Financial Services
BBJP
EZJ
Consumer Cyclical
BBJP
EZJ
Communication Services
BBJP
EZJ
Healthcare
BBJP
EZJ
Consumer Defensive
BBJP
EZJ
Basic Materials
BBJP
EZJ
Real Estate
BBJP
EZJ
Utilities
BBJP
EZJ
Energy
BBJP
EZJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBJP vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank
BBJP
EZJ
BBJP vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBJP | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.19 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 6.72 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBJP | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.48 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.21 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and EZJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBJP | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -58.63% | +25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -26.78% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -31.48% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -58.63% | +25.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -4.25% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -21.29% | +12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 8.72% | -4.68% |
Volatility
BBJP vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 4.26%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBJP | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 8.67% | -4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 30.75% | -15.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 39.75% | -20.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 36.59% | -18.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 34.54% | -16.25% |
BBJP vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBJP vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than EZJ's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.65% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BBJP and EZJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZJ has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to BBJP (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs EZJ's -58.63%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.92% vs 7.67% for EZJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.
BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.95% for EZJ.
BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBJP and EZJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer