PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBJP vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBJP vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 63.93% return.


BBJP

1D
1.79%
1M
1.46%
6M
7.86%
YTD
15.79%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.07%

DBE

1D
-4.28%
1M
11.01%
6M
47.49%
YTD
63.93%
1Y
55.67%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
11.75%
ALL TIME*
2.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$134.10M$105.88M$113.31M
$1.35M$1.09M$1.64M

BBJP vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
15.79%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
63.93%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-21.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and DBE is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.14

The correlation between BBJP and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBJP vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBJP vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBJPDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.26

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

7.03

-0.12

BBJP vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBJPDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-86.69%

+54.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-24.72%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-24.72%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-38.74%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-37.77%

+35.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-57.12%

+48.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

7.95%

-3.70%

Volatility

BBJP vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 7.47%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.88%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBJPDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

15.88%

-8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.48%

33.82%

-16.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

37.86%

-17.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

30.19%

-11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

28.64%

-10.17%

BBJP vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBJP vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than DBE's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.63%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.36%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBJP and DBE have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to BBJP (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 16.46% vs 9.40% for BBJP. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 16.46% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 2.36% for DBE.

BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBJP and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer