PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIO vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBIO vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIO achieves a -12.67% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 73.48% return.


BBIO

1D
-1.11%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-12.67%
6M
-11.11%
1Y
68.47%
3Y*
58.58%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*

ANAB

1D
3.37%
1M
-10.55%
YTD
73.48%
6M
87.15%
1Y
259.27%
3Y*
64.14%
5Y*
28.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIO vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
-12.67%178.75%-32.03%429.79%-54.32%-76.54%102.88%14.51%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
73.48%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-69.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIO and ANAB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.33

The correlation between BBIO and ANAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBIO:

$13.01B

ANAB:

$1.61B

EPS

BBIO:

-$3.76

ANAB:

-$0.91

PS Ratio

BBIO:

22.81

ANAB:

7.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBIO:

$566.04M

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBIO:

$538.20M

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

BBIO:

-$602.24M

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIO vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIO
BBIO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIO vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBIOANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.53

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

9.28

-5.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

22.38

-14.11

BBIO vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIO and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIO vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIO drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIO and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIOANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.80%

-92.08%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.25%

-28.15%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.08%

-69.32%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.89%

-69.32%

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.41%

-34.57%

+18.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.77%

-64.64%

+18.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.31%

11.64%

-3.33%

Volatility

BBIO vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) is 10.47%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that BBIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIOANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.47%

12.40%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.18%

46.31%

-12.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.52%

68.78%

-22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

85.91%

65.31%

+20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.77%

75.44%

+8.33%

Dividends

BBIO vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBIO nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BBIO vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
180.60M
25.56M
(BBIO) Total Revenue
(ANAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIO and ANAB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANAB has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to BBIO (10.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIO dropped -92.80% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIO and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer