BBHM vs. XHLF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XHLF.

Performance

BBHM vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 1.39% return.

BBHM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: -0.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XHLF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHM vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	1.78%	2.74%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	1.39%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHM and XHLF is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.00

Return for Risk

BBHM vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHLF

XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHM vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBHM	XHLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	10.75	-10.25

Drawdowns

BBHM vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and XHLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBHM	XHLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.78%	-0.11%	-9.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.28%	0.00%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-0.00%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBHM	XHLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	0.32%	+17.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.46%	0.42%	+17.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.46%	0.42%	+17.04%

BBHM vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBHM vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF	3.85%	3.98%	4.96%	4.50%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBHM and XHLF in my portfolio?

BBHM and XHLF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBHM or XHLF?

On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBHM or XHLF?

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBHM or XHLF?

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.

What is the main difference between BBHM and XHLF?

BBHM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XHLF is Government Bonds. BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.03% for XHLF.