BBHM vs. FCUS
Compare and contrast key facts about BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS).
BBHM and FCUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBHM is a passively managed fund by BBH that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on May 24, 2021. FCUS is an actively managed fund by Pinnacle. It was launched on Dec 28, 2022.
Performance
BBHM vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBHM vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | -1.59% | 2.74% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 17.00% | 4.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHM achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 17.00% return.
BBHM
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCUS
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 64.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBHM vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BBHM vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank
BBHM
FCUS
BBHM vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.86 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHM and FCUS is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BBHM vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison
BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF | 3.70% | 4.33% | 11.19% |
Drawdowns
BBHM vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and FCUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -39.89% | +30.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -7.80% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -7.83% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.36% | — |
Volatility
BBHM vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBHM | FCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 34.89% | -16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 30.06% | -11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 30.06% | -11.46% |