PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBH vs. SMHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBH vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBH vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
0.04%21.18%-12.72%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
-0.32%30.00%17.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBH achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than SMHX's -0.32% return.


BBH

1D
0.70%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
0.04%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.57%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
6.42%

SMHX

1D
1.86%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
60.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBH vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBH and SMHX have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

BBH vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBH
BBH Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
BBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBH Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SMHX
SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBH vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBHSMHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.55

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

2.19

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

3.56

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.56

9.59

-4.03

BBH vs. SMHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBH Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the SMHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBH and SMHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHSMHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.55

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.77

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between BBH and SMHX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BBH vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison

BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than SMHX's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
0.51%0.51%0.80%0.43%0.47%0.21%0.36%0.34%0.50%0.55%0.30%0.27%
SMHX
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
0.02%0.02%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BBH vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than SMHX's maximum drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and SMHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHSMHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-38.53%

-34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-17.51%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.15%

-10.19%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.05%

-7.94%

-18.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

6.50%

-2.74%

Volatility

BBH vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) is 7.01%, while VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that BBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBHSMHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

11.28%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

24.45%

-10.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.72%

39.40%

-16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

39.80%

-18.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

39.80%

-17.53%