PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBH vs. PBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBH vs. PBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBH achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than PBE's -1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BBH has underperformed PBE with an annualized return of 5.52%, while PBE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.34% annualized return.


BBH

1D
-2.26%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
5.52%

PBE

1D
-2.22%
1M
1.51%
YTD
-1.43%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBH vs. PBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
-3.98%21.18%-4.29%3.94%-15.25%11.81%22.13%26.34%-10.70%16.46%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
-1.43%24.84%1.10%3.71%-10.83%1.54%25.66%18.65%-0.19%22.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BBH and PBE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.84

The correlation between BBH and PBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBH vs. PBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBH
PBE

Healthcare

99.9%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBH
99.9%
PBE
100.0%

Basic Materials

BBH

-

PBE

-

Communication Services

BBH

-

PBE

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBH

-

PBE

-

Consumer Defensive

BBH

-

PBE

-

Energy

BBH

-

PBE

-

Financial Services

BBH

-

PBE
0.0%

Industrials

BBH

-

PBE

-

Real Estate

BBH

-

PBE

-

Technology

BBH

-

PBE

-

Utilities

BBH

-

PBE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBH vs. PBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBH
BBH Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBH Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PBE
PBE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBH vs. PBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBHPBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.55

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

2.33

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.62

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

7.37

-1.73

BBH vs. PBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBH Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the PBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBH and PBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHPBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.55

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.13

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.30

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.32

+0.06

Drawdowns

BBH vs. PBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than PBE's maximum drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and PBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHPBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-45.69%

-27.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-11.73%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.74%

-22.43%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.86%

-34.71%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.86%

-37.84%

-2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-5.55%

-10.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-16.24%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

4.17%

-0.07%

Volatility

BBH vs. PBE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) at 5.33%. This indicates that BBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHPBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.33%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

13.30%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.91%

18.67%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

22.52%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.16%

24.91%

-2.75%

BBH vs. PBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PBE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBH vs. PBE - Dividend Comparison

BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than PBE's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
0.53%0.51%0.80%0.43%0.47%0.21%0.36%0.34%0.50%0.55%0.30%0.27%
PBE
Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF
1.07%1.00%0.05%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.38%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBH and PBE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBH has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PBE (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBH dropped -72.70% vs PBE's -45.69%.

On 10-year performance, PBE leads with 7.34% vs 5.52% for BBH. On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PBE has performed better with a 7.34% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.

PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.53% for BBH.

BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index, while PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BBH and 0.59% for PBE.

PBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBH and PBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer