BBGLX vs. SWLGX
BBGLX (Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BBGLX returned 5.33%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for SWLGX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BBGLX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -0.51% return.
BBGLX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.97%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 1Y
- 9.24%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | 1.72% | 2.79% | 21.45% | 32.21% | -26.82% | 23.34% | 34.84% | 33.32% | 0.10% | -0.77% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -0.51% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBGLX and SWLGX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BBGLX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBGLX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
BBGLX
SWLGX
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBGLX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.45 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 1.35 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBGLX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -32.69% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.44% | -16.16% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.44% | -23.30% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -32.69% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -8.74% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -7.03% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.65% | 5.37% | +4.28% |
Volatility
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) is 4.17%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that BBGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBGLX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 6.40% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 14.03% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 17.49% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 21.80% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 22.68% | -3.23% |
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBGLX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.16% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 7.71% | 3.67% | 2.05% | 5.25% | 0.80% | 0.92% | 0.52% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BBGLX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWLGX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to BBGLX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBGLX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer