PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGLX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 13.75%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


BBGLX

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
3.18%
6M
2.35%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
13.75%

FXAIX

1D
1.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.68%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
3.18%2.79%21.45%32.21%-26.82%23.34%34.84%33.32%0.10%25.33%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
10.19%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and FXAIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.94

The correlation between BBGLX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX
BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBGLXFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.39

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

3.04

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

13.75

-13.27

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGLXFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-33.79%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.44%

-8.89%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-18.76%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-24.50%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-33.79%

+1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.49%

-1.36%

-7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-3.79%

-2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.14%

1.96%

+7.18%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.77%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGLXFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

4.77%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

9.91%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

12.47%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.01%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

18.11%

+1.36%

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBGLX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.16%0.78%0.71%7.71%3.67%2.05%5.25%0.80%0.92%0.52%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BBGLX and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBGLX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FXAIX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGLX and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer