PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGLX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has outperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 13.89%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


BBGLX

1D
-0.61%
1M
4.93%
YTD
5.93%
6M
-4.32%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
13.89%

MEIKX

1D
0.60%
1M
0.43%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.90%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
5.93%2.79%21.45%32.21%-26.82%23.34%34.84%33.32%0.10%25.33%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.52%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and MEIKX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between BBGLX and MEIKX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX
BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBGLXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.98

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

6.87

-6.00

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBGLXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.29

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.57

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.61

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.40

+0.26

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGLXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-56.81%

+24.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.44%

-6.76%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-13.15%

-9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-17.50%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-36.68%

+4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-1.80%

-4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-9.45%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

1.95%

+6.97%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) at 2.35%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGLXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.35%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

7.75%

+5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

10.37%

+5.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.63%

13.91%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

16.55%

+2.88%

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBGLX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.16%0.78%0.71%7.71%3.67%2.05%5.25%0.80%0.92%0.52%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.50%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBGLX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBGLX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MEIKX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MEIKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGLX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer