BBCP vs. NWPX
BBCP (Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.) and NWPX (Northwest Pipe Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BBCP in Engineering & Construction, NWPX in Metal Fabrication. Over the past 5 years, BBCP returned 7.34%/yr vs 38.15%/yr for NWPX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBCP vs. NWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBCP achieves a 66.32% return, which is significantly lower than NWPX's 129.68% return.
BBCP
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 46.65%
- YTD
- 66.32%
- 6M
- 59.89%
- 1Y
- 77.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- —
NWPX
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- 27.85%
- YTD
- 129.68%
- 6M
- 121.84%
- 1Y
- 257.93%
- 3Y*
- 70.75%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 29.87%
BBCP vs. NWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCP Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. | 66.32% | 13.72% | -18.78% | 40.17% | -28.66% | 114.10% | -29.98% | -33.54% | -15.59% | -0.61% |
NWPX Northwest Pipe Company | 129.68% | 29.49% | 59.48% | -10.21% | 5.97% | 12.37% | -15.04% | 43.02% | 21.68% | 24.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBCP and NWPX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2017 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, BBCP and NWPX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
BBCP:
$569.27M
NWPX:
$1.41B
BBCP:
$0.18
NWPX:
$4.25
BBCP:
63.28
NWPX:
33.78
BBCP:
1.41
NWPX:
2.59
BBCP:
2.40
NWPX:
3.48
BBCP:
$409.82M
NWPX:
$548.14M
BBCP:
$156.92M
NWPX:
$110.94M
BBCP:
$86.53M
NWPX:
$75.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBCP vs. NWPX — Risk / Return Rank
BBCP
NWPX
BBCP vs. NWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBCP | NWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.85 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 16.54 | -13.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 55.18 | -47.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBCP vs. NWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBCP drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, roughly equal to the maximum NWPX drawdown of -87.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCP and NWPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBCP | NWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.79% | -87.71% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.00% | -15.70% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.19% | -35.36% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.67% | -35.71% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | 0.00% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -43.31% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.58% | 4.70% | +5.88% |
Volatility
BBCP vs. NWPX - Volatility Comparison
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) has a higher volatility of 27.51% compared to Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) at 11.22%. This indicates that BBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBCP | NWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.51% | 11.22% | +16.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.13% | 31.38% | +5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.54% | 40.65% | +8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.92% | 36.56% | +6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 41.02% | +17.66% |
Dividends
BBCP vs. NWPX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBCP nor NWPX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BBCP Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 14.90% |
NWPX Northwest Pipe Company | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BBCP vs. NWPX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. and Northwest Pipe Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBCP vs. NWPX - Profitability Comparison
BBCP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 41.26M and revenue of 106.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.6%.
NWPX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a gross profit of 26.67M and revenue of 138.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.3%.
BBCP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.06M and revenue of 106.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
NWPX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported an operating income of 12.66M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
BBCP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 2.55M and revenue of 106.80M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
NWPX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a net income of 10.53M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCP and NWPX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBCP has higher volatility (27.51%) compared to NWPX (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCP dropped -84.79% vs NWPX's -87.71%.
NWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.39 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBCP and NWPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer