PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCP vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBCP vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBCP vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBCP
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.
6.41%13.72%-18.78%40.17%-28.66%114.10%-29.98%-33.54%-15.59%0.52%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-3.65%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%10.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCP achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's -3.65% return.


BBCP

1D
5.47%
1M
4.23%
YTD
6.41%
6M
2.59%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*

SPY

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
-3.65%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCP vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCP
BBCP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCP vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBCPSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

0.96

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

1.49

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.53

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

7.27

-4.38

BBCP vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCP and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBCPSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.96

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.70

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.56

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between BBCP and SPY is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BBCP vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BBCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCP
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.
0.00%14.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.13%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

BBCP vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCP drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCP and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCPSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.79%

-55.19%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.00%

-12.05%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.67%

-24.50%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.48%

-5.53%

-29.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.05%

-9.09%

-30.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.49%

2.54%

+8.95%

Volatility

BBCP vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.35%. This indicates that BBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBCPSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.17%

5.35%

+6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.53%

9.50%

+19.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.73%

19.06%

+25.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.54%

17.06%

+23.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.35%

17.92%

+40.43%