NWPX vs. ASML
NWPX (Northwest Pipe Company) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. NWPX operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, NWPX returned 28.73%/yr vs 34.11%/yr for ASML. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NWPX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWPX achieves a 91.55% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 61.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NWPX has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 28.73%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 34.11% annualized return.
NWPX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 12.25%
- YTD
- 91.55%
- 6M
- 101.41%
- 1Y
- 200.38%
- 3Y*
- 61.93%
- 5Y*
- 30.35%
- 10Y*
- 28.73%
ASML
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 24.54%
- YTD
- 61.93%
- 6M
- 51.85%
- 1Y
- 132.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.91%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- 34.11%
NWPX vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWPX Northwest Pipe Company | 91.55% | 29.49% | 59.48% | -10.21% | 5.97% | 12.37% | -15.04% | 43.02% | 21.68% | 11.15% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 61.93% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWPX and ASML is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1995 | 0.22 |
The correlation between NWPX and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NWPX:
$1.17B
ASML:
$665.86B
NWPX:
$4.25
ASML:
$25.86
NWPX:
28.17
ASML:
66.77
NWPX:
0.55
ASML:
4.39
NWPX:
2.16
ASML:
19.84
NWPX:
2.90
ASML:
31.97
NWPX:
$548.14M
ASML:
$33.69B
NWPX:
$110.94M
ASML:
$17.72B
NWPX:
$75.93M
ASML:
$12.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWPX vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
NWPX
ASML
NWPX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWPX | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.45 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.85 | 7.48 | +5.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.75 | 20.18 | +22.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWPX | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08 | 3.29 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.89 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.56 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
NWPX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWPX drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWPX and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWPX | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.71% | -90.00% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.70% | -17.85% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.36% | -45.38% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.71% | -56.84% | +21.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.50% | -56.84% | +10.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | 0.00% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.40% | -28.15% | -15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 6.61% | -1.90% |
Volatility
NWPX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) is 10.42%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 14.67%. This indicates that NWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWPX | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 14.67% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.22% | 32.21% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.79% | 40.58% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.47% | 42.03% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.05% | 38.50% | +2.55% |
Dividends
NWPX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
NWPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.51% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
NWPX Northwest Pipe Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NWPX vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Pipe Company and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NWPX vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
NWPX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a gross profit of 26.67M and revenue of 138.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.3%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
NWPX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported an operating income of 12.66M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
NWPX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a net income of 10.53M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NWPX and ASML have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to NWPX (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWPX dropped -87.71% vs ASML's -90.00%.
NWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWPX and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer