PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BBCP vs. LMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BBCP and LMB is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

BBCP vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
22.98%
27.52%
BBCP
LMB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BBCP:

-0.06

LMB:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

BBCP:

0.24

LMB:

2.06

Omega Ratio

BBCP:

1.03

LMB:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

BBCP:

-0.05

LMB:

3.53

Martin Ratio

BBCP:

-0.14

LMB:

8.78

Ulcer Index

BBCP:

21.75%

LMB:

9.96%

Daily Std Dev

BBCP:

45.87%

LMB:

59.73%

Max Drawdown

BBCP:

-84.79%

LMB:

-84.10%

Current Drawdown

BBCP:

-36.29%

LMB:

-20.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBCP:

$375.26M

LMB:

$972.64M

EPS

BBCP:

$0.26

LMB:

$2.18

PE Ratio

BBCP:

27.23

LMB:

39.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBCP:

$328.16M

LMB:

$375.13M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBCP:

$131.94M

LMB:

$98.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

BBCP:

$76.96M

LMB:

$36.06M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCP achieves a 19.48% return, which is significantly higher than LMB's -2.56% return.


BBCP

YTD

19.48%

1M

-11.39%

6M

29.18%

1Y

-2.48%

5Y*

6.04%

10Y*

N/A

LMB

YTD

-2.56%

1M

-16.28%

6M

33.90%

1Y

101.23%

5Y*

79.62%

10Y*

27.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBCP vs. LMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BBCP is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BBCP is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BBCP is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BBCP is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BBCP is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BBCP is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMB is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMB is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMB is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMB is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMB is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMB is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BBCP vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BBCP, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.061.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for BBCP, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.242.06
The chart of Omega ratio for BBCP, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for BBCP, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.053.53
The chart of Martin ratio for BBCP, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.148.78
BBCP
LMB

The current BBCP Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCP and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.06
1.46
BBCP
LMB

Dividends

BBCP vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

BBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, while LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM
BBCP
Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.
14.18%
LMB
Limbach Holdings, Inc.
0.00%

Drawdowns

BBCP vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCP drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, roughly equal to the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCP and LMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-36.29%
-20.87%
BBCP
LMB

Volatility

BBCP vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) is 12.84%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 22.07%. This indicates that BBCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
12.84%
22.07%
BBCP
LMB

Financials

BBCP vs. LMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab