PortfoliosLab logo
BBCP vs. LMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BBCP and LMB is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BBCP vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BBCP:

0.27

LMB:

1.98

Sortino Ratio

BBCP:

0.74

LMB:

2.55

Omega Ratio

BBCP:

1.10

LMB:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

BBCP:

0.25

LMB:

3.45

Martin Ratio

BBCP:

0.69

LMB:

9.38

Ulcer Index

BBCP:

20.91%

LMB:

12.69%

Daily Std Dev

BBCP:

53.66%

LMB:

61.63%

Max Drawdown

BBCP:

-84.79%

LMB:

-84.10%

Current Drawdown

BBCP:

-34.57%

LMB:

-5.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBCP:

$387.27M

LMB:

$1.46B

EPS

BBCP:

$0.28

LMB:

$2.79

PE Ratio

BBCP:

25.71

LMB:

44.98

PS Ratio

BBCP:

0.93

LMB:

2.74

PB Ratio

BBCP:

1.47

LMB:

9.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBCP:

$307.55M

LMB:

$532.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBCP:

$121.99M

LMB:

$148.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

BBCP:

$80.89M

LMB:

$52.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCP achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's 48.60% return.


BBCP

YTD

22.70%

1M

17.92%

6M

16.57%

1Y

14.61%

3Y*

14.81%

5Y*

19.67%

10Y*

N/A

LMB

YTD

48.60%

1M

37.37%

6M

28.71%

1Y

120.52%

3Y*

186.77%

5Y*

113.73%

10Y*

29.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.

Limbach Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBCP vs. LMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BBCP is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BBCP is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BBCP is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BBCP is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BBCP is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BBCP is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMB is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMB is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMB is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMB is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMB is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMB is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BBCP vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCP and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BBCP vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

BBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.81%, while LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

BBCP vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCP drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, roughly equal to the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCP and LMB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BBCP vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) is 9.31%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 15.35%. This indicates that BBCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BBCP vs. LMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
86.45M
133.11M
(BBCP) Total Revenue
(LMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BBCP vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
36.1%
27.6%
(BBCP) Gross Margin
(LMB) Gross Margin
BBCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.24M and revenue of 86.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.1%.

LMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.72M and revenue of 133.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

BBCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.49M and revenue of 86.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

LMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.91M and revenue of 133.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

BBCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -2.64M and revenue of 86.45M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

LMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 10.21M and revenue of 133.11M, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.