BBCP vs. LMB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB).

Performance

BBCP vs. LMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBCP vs. LMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBCP Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.	6.41%	13.72%	-18.78%	40.17%	-28.66%	114.10%	-29.98%	-33.54%	-15.59%	0.52%
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc.	0.26%	-8.99%	88.12%	336.79%	15.67%	-27.01%	226.19%	2.72%	-73.39%	3.98%

Fundamentals

EPS BBCP : $0.13 LMB : $3.02
PE Ratio BBCP : 56.67 LMB : 25.82
PS Ratio BBCP : 0.94 LMB : 1.57
Total Revenue (TTM) BBCP : $396.98M LMB : $603.58M
Gross Profit (TTM) BBCP : $151.85M LMB : $162.40M
EBITDA (TTM) BBCP : $83.67M LMB : $64.27M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCP achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than LMB's 0.26% return.

BBCP

• 1D: 5.47%
• 1M: 5.93%
• YTD: 6.41%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 30.77%
• 3Y*: 5.83%
• 5Y*: 1.42%
• 10Y*: —

LMB

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -14.62%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: -19.64%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 65.24%
• 5Y*: 49.76%
• 10Y*: 22.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BBCP vs. LMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCP

BBCP Risk / Return Rank: 64
BBCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BBCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BBCP Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BBCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BBCP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

LMB

LMB Risk / Return Rank: 43
LMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LMB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
LMB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCP vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBCP	LMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	0.09	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	0.50	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.06	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	0.04	+1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.89	0.07	+2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBCP vs. LMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the LMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCP and LMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBCP	LMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	0.09	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.83	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.37	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between BBCP and LMB is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BBCP vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBCP nor LMB has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
BBCP Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	14.90%
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BBCP vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCP drawdown since its inception was -84.79%, roughly equal to the maximum LMB drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCP and LMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBCP	LMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.79%	-84.10%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.00%	-55.92%	+30.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.67%	-55.97%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.48%	-47.80%	+12.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.05%	-31.40%	-8.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.49%	33.49%	-22.00%

Volatility

BBCP vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP) is 12.17%, while Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that BBCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBCP	LMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.17%	16.41%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.53%	38.46%	-9.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.73%	55.96%	-11.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.54%	60.34%	-19.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.35%	61.80%	-3.45%

Financials

BBCP vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BBCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.96M and revenue of 90.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.3%.

LMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 42.29M and revenue of 184.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.

BBCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.51M and revenue of 90.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

LMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.66M and revenue of 184.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

BBCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -2.44M and revenue of 90.56M, resulting in a net margin of -2.7%.

LMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 8.79M and revenue of 184.58M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.