BBBS vs. XEMD
BBBS (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBS is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBS returned 4.44% vs 11.81% for XEMD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBBS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.
Performance
BBBS vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.94% return.
BBBS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBBS vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.77% | 6.67% | 4.96% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.94% | 13.98% | 9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBS and XEMD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BBBS and XEMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBS vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
BBBS
XEMD
BBBS vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBBS | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.51 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.37 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.59 | 15.17 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBBS | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.37 | 1.40 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
BBBS vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBS | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -10.01% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.45% | -3.52% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.19% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -1.26% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.78% | -0.43% |
Volatility
BBBS vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.49%, while BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBS | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 1.36% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 3.70% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87% | 4.65% | -2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 6.88% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 6.88% | -4.65% |
BBBS vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBBS vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than XEMD's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.55% | 4.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.81% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBBS and XEMD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XEMD has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
On 1-year performance, XEMD leads with 11.81% vs 4.44% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.
BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBS and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer