BBBS vs. FLRN
Compare and contrast key facts about Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN).
BBBS and FLRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBBS is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. FLRN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. Both BBBS and FLRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBBS or FLRN.
Correlation
The correlation between BBBS and FLRN is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
BBBS vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BBBS:
2.37%
FLRN:
0.84%
BBBS:
-1.18%
FLRN:
-14.64%
BBBS:
-0.38%
FLRN:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 0.33% return.
BBBS
0.11%
0.49%
2.65%
N/A
N/A
N/A
FLRN
0.33%
0.52%
2.88%
6.21%
3.06%
2.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBBS vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBBS vs. FLRN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BBBS
FLRN
BBBS vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
BBBS vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than FLRN's 5.65% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.30% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 5.65% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.40% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.63% | 1.14% | 0.63% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
BBBS vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and FLRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBBS vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.16%. This indicates that BBBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.