BBBS vs. XCCC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBBS (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBS is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBS returned 4.44% vs 5.67% for XCCC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBBS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XCCC.

Performance

BBBS vs. XCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than XCCC's 0.13% return.

BBBS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCCC

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. XCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.77%	6.67%	4.96%
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.13%	7.25%	13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and XCCC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.45

The correlation between BBBS and XCCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBBS vs. XCCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBBS	XCCC
Healthcare	1.0%	3.2%
Communication Services	0.2%	12.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	0.9%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.8%
Energy	-	3.9%
Industrials	-	3.7%
Real Estate	-	3.7%
Technology	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BBBS vs. XCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS

BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

XCCC

XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 29
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. XCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBBS	XCCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.08	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	1.58	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.20	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	1.11	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	3.71	+8.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBBS vs. XCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the XCCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and XCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBBS	XCCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.08	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.37	0.96	+1.40

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. XCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum XCCC drawdown of -10.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and XCCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBS	XCCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-10.99%	+9.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-5.11%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.87%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-1.93%	+1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	1.53%	-1.18%

Volatility

BBBS vs. XCCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.49%, while BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBS	XCCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.49%	1.50%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.36%	4.00%	-2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	5.25%	-3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.23%	8.82%	-6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.23%	8.82%	-6.59%

BBBS vs. XCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XCCC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBBS vs. XCCC - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than XCCC's 10.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.58%	4.55%	4.31%	0.00%	0.00%
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	10.03%	10.06%	10.68%	12.05%	7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBS and XCCC in my portfolio?

BBBS and XCCC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBBS or XCCC?

XCCC has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs XCCC's -10.99%.

Which ETF is better, BBBS or XCCC?

On 1-year performance, XCCC leads with 5.67% vs 4.44% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBS or XCCC?

Over the 1-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 5.67% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBS or XCCC?

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBS or XCCC?

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.03%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

What is the main difference between BBBS and XCCC?

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while XCCC is High Yield Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.40% for XCCC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.