BBBI vs. XEMD
BBBI (BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBI is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBI returned 2.34% vs 8.65% for XEMD. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBBI charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.
Performance
BBBI vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBI achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's 2.49% return.
BBBI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.17%
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $531.26K | $827.47K | $943.56K | |
| $5.44M | $11.46M | $8.01M |
BBBI vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBI BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | -0.50% | 9.28% | 4.38% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 2.49% | 13.98% | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBI and XEMD is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BBBI and XEMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBI vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
BBBI
XEMD
BBBI vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBBI | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 2.53 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 10.95 | -7.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBBI vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBI drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum XEMD drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBI and XEMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBI | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -10.01% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -3.52% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -0.96% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -1.23% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.81% | +0.19% |
Volatility
BBBI vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 0.96%. This indicates that BBBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBI | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.96% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 3.80% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 4.74% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 6.80% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 6.80% | -1.84% |
BBBI vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBI has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBBI vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
BBBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBI BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.90% | 4.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 5.24% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBBI and XEMD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBBI has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to XEMD (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBI dropped -4.11% vs XEMD's -10.01%.
On 1-year performance, XEMD leads with 8.65% vs 2.34% for BBBI. On fees, BBBI is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XEMD has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XEMD has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBBI is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.46% for BBBI.
BBBI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XEMD is Emerging Markets Bonds. BBBI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index, while XEMD tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBI and 0.29% for XEMD.
XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBI and XEMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer