PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBI vs. XBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBI vs. XBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) and BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBI achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than XBB's 1.75% return.


BBBI

1D
0.31%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.73%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.56%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBI vs. XBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBI and XBB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.61

The correlation between BBBI and XBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBI vs. XBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBI
BBBI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BBBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

XBB
XBB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBI vs. XBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) and BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBBIXBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.02

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

8.36

-2.46

BBBI vs. XBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the XBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBI and XBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBBI vs. XBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBI drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum XBB drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBI and XBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBIXBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-8.87%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-2.80%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.12%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-1.32%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.68%

+0.22%

Volatility

BBBI vs. XBB - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XBB) at 1.16%. This indicates that BBBI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBIXBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.16%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

2.88%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03%

3.97%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

7.08%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

7.08%

-2.08%

BBBI vs. XBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBI has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XBB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBBI vs. XBB - Dividend Comparison

BBBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than XBB's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBI
BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.77%4.90%4.61%0.00%0.00%
XBB
BondBloxx BB Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.54%5.42%6.35%6.15%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBBI and XBB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBI has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to XBB (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBI dropped -4.11% vs XBB's -8.87%.

On 1-year performance, XBB leads with 5.63% vs 5.29% for BBBI. On fees, BBBI is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XBB has performed better with a 5.63% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBI is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBB.

XBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 4.77% for BBBI.

BBBI is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XBB is High Yield Bonds. BBBI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index, while XBB tracks ICE BofA BB US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBI and 0.20% for XBB.

XBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBI and XBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer