BBB vs. AOR
BBB (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - BBB tracks the S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index while AOR tracks the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBB returned 4.20% vs 17.17% for AOR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBB charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
BBB vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 6.31% return.
BBB
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- -2.50%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOR
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 5.96%
- 1Y
- 17.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
BBB vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | -1.86% | 9.73% | 38.82% | -0.86% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 6.31% | 16.44% | 10.68% | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBB and AOR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between BBB and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBB vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
BBB
AOR
BBB vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBB | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.36 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 2.60 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.59 | 11.13 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBB vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBB | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -24.44% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.74% | -6.64% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -1.53% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -3.47% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 1.55% | +5.61% |
Volatility
BBB vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) at 3.61%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBB | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 3.61% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 7.49% | +6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 8.96% | +9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 10.64% | +11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 10.66% | +11.37% |
BBB vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBB vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than AOR's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.49% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.21% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBB and AOR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBB has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to AOR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 1-year performance, AOR leads with 17.17% vs 4.20% for BBB. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOR has performed better with a 17.17% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.22% for BBB.
BBB tracks S&P 500 and S&P Bitcoin 75/25 Blend Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.15% for AOR.
AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBB and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer